With the surge in canned options — think wines in sleek aluminum and lighter beers — packaging safety is under the spotlight. Many manufacturers now use BPANI (Bisphenol A Non-Intent) can liners, formulated to avoid BPA and related substitutes like BPS, while preventing can corrosion. But do these coatings truly meet safety expectations for foods and beverages?
As more health-focused consumers seek clarity, it’s essential to look closely at what BPANI is made of, the available safety research, and what that means in real-world use. This article breaks down BPANI aluminum can liners — their advantages, possible drawbacks, and the best canned drink picks for 2026 — so you can make informed choices with confidence.
![[object Object]](/assets/images/news/20251111172204.jpg)
BPANI stands for “Bisphenol A Non-Intent,” indicating the coating is made without deliberately adding bisphenol chemicals such as BPA, BPS, or BPF. Older epoxy-based can linings often relied on BPA and could release small amounts into acidic products — think tomatoes or wine — prompting health concerns. In contrast, BPANI coatings typically use alternatives like acrylic, polyester, or olefin polymers to form an interior barrier in the can. This barrier helps stop the metal from corroding and is designed to reduce chemical migration, which makes these liners well-suited for products like canned wines and craft beers.
However, “non-intent” doesn’t mean absolutely zero bisphenols; minute traces can still appear due to factors like cross-contamination during manufacturing. These coatings also align with current market needs by supporting lighter, more portable, and potentially more eco-friendly beverage packaging, including options such as low-calorie beers. Evaluating their safety requires looking at the relevant science and regulatory standards.
The chief safety issue with can coatings is migration of chemicals into beverages, especially endocrine-disrupting compounds. Bisphenol A (BPA) has been associated with reproductive problems, developmental effects, and obesity, and its common substitute, bisphenol S (BPS), shows comparable hormonal activity — undermining the reassurance of “BPA-free” labels. BPANI coatings address this by excluding all bisphenols, aiming to avoid these leaching-related risks.
Emerging data indicate that BPANI coatings are safer than BPA- or BPS-based liners. A 2023 paper in Toxicological Sciences reported that acrylic and polyester BPANI formulations exhibit virtually no endocrine-disrupting activity compared with BPS. Migration assessments in real products — such as aluminum-canned wines (e.g., Maker Wine’s Sauvignon Blanc) — showed only tiny releases of non-bisphenol substances, even under acidic conditions. Similarly, breweries like Athletic Brewing have adopted BPANI for low-calorie beers to protect taste and consumer safety. That said, because these materials are relatively new, robust long-term human studies on BPANI-related constituents (including certain acrylic monomers) remain scarce. Further, a 2025 analysis by the Environmental Working Group found that trace bisphenol residues can persist from processing equipment, though measured amounts were far below established health limits. In short, BPANI liners represent a safer choice but do not eliminate all risk.